freeplay ranger manual

I'd listen to the radio 8-10 hours a day and read with the built-in LED light for another few hours at night, all on a single weekly charge. BTW, I use the AC adapter for full charging. Solar charging is slow but at least there's zero labor involved It's great for taking on picnics and by the pool. On second thought, maybe I should use the LSD cells, just to bring it up to date.The LSD's will hold their charge every bit as long and probably longer than Nicads and you'll get about 3 times the capacity. It's a no-lose mod. As long as you've opened up the radio to replace them, why would you not go LSD?Last time I checked the charging requirements for NiCd and NiMH differ. If the radio's charging circuit is made for NiCd cells (witch at 650mAh in the AA form factor they most likely are) and you put NiMH (LSD or other wise) in there - your gonna fry the cells. It may take a while but you are not going to get your 7-8 years out of them. I would suggest sourcing the highest capacity NiCd cells from a good OEM (Sanyo?) and seal it back up - you should get your self another 10 years or better of service. As an added suggestion: test how much current the radio charges the cells at then do the math and figure out how long it takes to charge the cells at that current. Then when you do charge it - try to not leave it plugged in much longer then that so that you are not overcharging the cells. I have a feeling that the charger is simply a low current trickle charger that just never turns off. This would make it really bad for NiMH but since NiCd are more robust they tend to do fine al long as they are cycled every once and a while like it sounds like you are doing with your usage pattern already. Another thing to think about - depending on the space inside - is there room to fit a larger sized cells inside like a C or a D NiCd. That could get you weeks of play out of one charge without having to worry about voltage or charging issues!

• freeplay ranger manual, freeplay ranger manual download, freeplay ranger manual pdf, freeplay ranger manual free, freeplay ranger manual 2017.

You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. To start viewing messages,I've been using it on AC power but it would be nice to get the portability back. Took it apart tonight: The radio uses a 3.6v 650mAh AA size battery pack. Question: Do I have to replace with a battery pack of the same capacity. Radio Shack has the 650mAh replacement, but with Battery Station's custom pack service I can get a 2400mAh pack. Thanks in advance.You'd have to crank all day and night just to charge the 650 mAh pack. I would say as long as you are replacing the pack with the same type of rechargeable cell (NiCd with NiCd) then you will be OK regardless of capacity. But now that I have said that and have done a double-take on those capacities, I'm going to recant. The 650 mAh pack is likely NiCd, but to get 2400 mAh you are looking at NiMH most likely. The NiCd's are going to hold a charge a lot longer than the NiMH, which tend to have very high rates of self-discharge in storage compared to NiCd. NiMH also is even less forgiving of neglect (non-use) than the NiCd's which have failed you. I would stick with the 650 mAh NiCd pack.If it ain't broke, eh. I forgot to mention that I've had this radio for almost 10 years and it has seen a lot of use. The NiCds didn't fail, they just reached the end of their life cycle. It was 7 or 8 years before they stopped holding a charge. Not bad at all. The Freeplay Plus Radio If the radio works all the way down to low amounts of voltage (partial charge) and you didn't want to have to recrank it as often and didn't use it all the time I would be tempted to consider some LSD nimh cells.You could even get by with 2AAAs and have more capacity than the nicads if you needed higher voltage to operate with less cranking than, say having 2100mah nimh AAs.They are generous, compassionate, and righteous.

I've decided to go with a direct replacement after having considered the risks involved with using the wrong cells.The reply was, yes, the charging circuit is limited to 650mAh and a pack with higher capacity would not charge properly. I was told that they do sell the replacement packs, though they aren't listed on the website, so I ordered one the next day.If so, how did you get your radio open. I see no visible attachments on mine?Disregard above post.The charge efficiency is almost 100%, so you will catch more of what you generateThe charge efficiency is almost 100%, so you will catch more of what you generate BVH: Like your Summit, the Freeplay Plus has a solar panel and crank, it's just a lot bigger. It's held together by a few screws and came apart without a fuss.Image resizer by SevenSkins. While the Ranger was a well-built truck, there are a few issues Ford Ranger owners note with their clutch system. Since we sell quite a few clutch kits for the Ford Ranger, we've decided to offer a quick troubleshooting guide for Ranger clutch problems.Basically, the hydraulics are not working, so the system will not work.If low, top off the system and test the clutch pedal. Next, check for leaks along the hydraulic lines. If discovered, identify and replace the bad lines or seals. Then, bleed the clutch system to get any air out. Even the smallest amount of air in the lines can prevent proper operation. If none of these helped, the slave cylinder, master cylinder, or both likely need to be replaced.Adjustments to the master cylinder push rod may be necessary to provide the proper clutch pedal free play.We've got quite a few kits for the Ranger. If you need help choosing the right kit (and are wondering whether or not to replace your flywheel), give us a call. Also, depending on the kit you buy, a new slave cylinder is often recommended.If this doesn't work, you must remove the master cylinder and bench bleed it.

It may take a while but you are not going to get your 7-8 years out of them. They are very sensitive to overcharging, and your simple wall wart adapter has no method of terminating the charge. NiCd is very forgiving of overcharging if it is a low current, as the wall wart probably is. I would not even think of putting NiMH in there and charging it with the wall wart. You will be underwhelmed by the service life.If you run it off AC (always trickle charging) you might as well forget nimh batteries. The ultimate thing to do if you can get to the batteries is to be able to take them out and charge them and put them back in and just wire a switch to disconnect the AC charging system so you can not drain or charge when plugged in.They are generous, compassionate, and righteous. If you don't mind mounting an external cell holder, you could use LSD NiMH cells and run the thing continuously for a couple weeks, then simply pull them out for a recharge on a proper battery charger. I have a large Sony radio that I run eight hours a day on LSD Hybrids, and the charge lasts for two or three weeks until the first cell takes a dump. Regarding the idea to estimate how long it takes the wall wart to charge a NiMH battery pack.The pack will stop powering the radio earlier and earlier because the first cell failed, but you will be charging it the same amount, so all the other cells that were not fully depleted will receive an overcharge, leading to a speedy demise of the other cells. On the other hand, if you were to start with some well-balanced LSD cells, such as Eneloop, by the time one cell croaks, it's pretty near time to replace the others anyway, so it's not a big loss to overcharge and kill the remaining cells anyway.If your radio has a DC in seperate of AC corded power you could think about rewiring it to a smart external charger.They are generous, compassionate, and righteous.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Please try again.Please try again.Please try again. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Register a free business account To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. As such, I would urge readers to take negative comments with a pinch of salt. For my part, I've been thrilled with this vehicle. Key features I love over the competition: Styling - new entrants (Fiat, Mercedes in particular) have done a great job on the styling front, but the Ranger still gets 5 stars from me. The Wildtrak has one of the most car-like interiors, which good detailing and reasonable materials for a pick-up that needs to be comfortable, as well as hard-wearing. Looks great inside and out. Driveability - it's smooth, quiet and easy to throw around. I would recommend the auto gearbox (I took the manual) and go for the driver pack for added safety and joy. It grips well and is extremely comfortable - non-stop trips to Dublin, the Alps and Nuremberg have been very pleasurable. Load capacity - well, it's a pickup, but with one of the best towing abilities in its class, it's got perform (and it does). Ford have really upped their game with this to ensure they stay on top. Reliability - so far, I've had no issues. The Ranger is a heavy vehicle and the brakes don't really seem up to the job, especially with a load. Either upgrade these or give yourself a little extra room. The interior heating seems to take an absolute age to come through on a cold day.

Check at the firewall where the master is mounted for signs of leaking first. This will indicate a bad master cylinder seal. Check along the lines as well. Slave cylinder leaks aren’t likely to cause this as a stand alone issue. Still, if there’s no fluid in the lines and no other cause is identified, it could be the slave cylinder.Thanks to this, we get to spend some time talking to Ranger owners about their clutch system problems. If you have any further technical issues, feel free to contact us. Website Design by Technetium. Manual.Contents, or download a full PDF of the Owner Manual in the Owner. Support areaNever startImmediatelyThe throttle mayChart. Adjust the freeplay if necessary. Engage the park brake. Shift the transmission to neutral. Allow it to warm up thoroughly. Measure the distance the throttleOnce proper adjustmentEnsure the engine idle is still within range. The company is based in London, UK. The company focuses on creating and developing the international market for self-sufficient energy products, and states that such a focus will help promote education and access to important information throughout the developing world.He said his problems stemmed from Freeplay Energy which he had joined in partnership to manufacture his radios. However, they had then altered Baylis' original design which used spring power to one that used a crank that charged an internal battery. This change meant the product was no longer subject to his patents. Baylis began a lobbying campaign to overhaul the patent systems in the UK to protect inventors from intellectual property theft.Weighing about 1 kg, the clockwork torch incorporates two improvements over the clockwork radio. Secondly, internal energy storage in a small rechargeable battery keeps the torch shining while the spring is rewound. One version of the clockwork torch is enclosed in clear plastic so that the inner workings can be seen.Retrieved 2010-11-11. Retrieved 2010-11-11. Retrieved 5 June 2013.

I do a lot of little journeys and 2 or three times a year it goes to the south of France. The Wildtrak is by far the best on a long run, it returns about 35mpg and is so quiet and smooth at 80mph (French motorways of course) you can whisper to the passenger next to you. Everyone who has travelled in it is surprised at how smooth and quiet it is. The interior with all the gadgets is great. Heater blower is a little loud, but even turns itself down when a phone call come in. The sync 3 is brilliant. The finish inside is a great improvement on the older model. The dash is superb. I have had it just 12months now, its not given a minute's problem so far. Things I dont like. It's heavy on juice round town, at 18\19 mpg. Its also very noisy for the first couple of minutes on a cold morning. The gearbox is also slow to change until it warms up. I didn't like the look of the front grille, so put the Raptor style on it. The front lights are not the best, and daytime running lights are very poor. I have replaced them with LED units by the fog lights. Beside this, I would say it's a brilliant pickup, I intend to keep this one for a good few years now. I love it! Reliability: 5 5 Has been 100% reliable.so far. Performance: 3 3 Could do with perhaps a little more go. Running costs: 3 3 Heavy on fuel round town. Sadly that's the only good thing I have to say about my very pretty shiny truck. I don't know where to start really, however they are mainly reliability issues, with a few added moans and groans about comfort and build quality. I opted for the 3.2 as on test drive of the 2.2, I found out it's performance was really poor. I previously had a 2014 Mitsubishi L200, and it went really well, so that's what I judged it on. So my 3.2 goes ok, bit noisy though, and not too refined, but Ford told me the economy would improve, and the engine noise would settle once run in properly. It was an ex demo, so I'd have thought it was partially already run in with 3,000 on the clock.

So on the way home I noticed it was pulling towards the curb. Then, 1,000 miles later the turbo went. Then the intercooler went. Then I had the engine management light come on on the dashboard, caused by a faulty sensor. Then I noticed the front tyres were wearing badly on the edges after 4,000 miles. The dealership has taken about 7 weeks in total to fix these issues, and time is money. Other minor issues are a harsh ride, poor interior,alarming rattles and creaks when going over the odd bump, and the fact that it's really poorly equipped unless you get a fully loaded ex demo or put your hand in your pocket. But on the plus side, it's a really good looking truck. Problems Electrics Engine Suspension Other Anthony Bucke from Dorset 3 3 I wouldn't recommend this car to a friend Version Double cab Limited 2.2 diesel manual Year of registration 2013 Average annual mileage More than 20,000 Typical MPG 20.00 Owned for 1 - 2 years Bought car Used Review Bought this ex-demonstrator from Vospers in Exeter. 3k miles on the clock, 6 months old. Within 3 months it was hesitating in 3rd gear - virtual mis-fire. Also other niggling faults with towbar, rear bumpers, trailer wiring, etc. 3 weeks ago, when vehicle less than 2 years old, and covered just 31,000 miles, hesitation again, which became a major mis-fire. AA diagnosed dropped valve. No help or support from Vospers. In fact 8 days elapsed before they looked at it. No support from Yeovil Ford. In desperation, 4 days after the breakdown I got in touch with Ford Customer Care who said if it is a mechanical failure they would under-write the cost of a hired replacement. This I organised - a Toyota Hiluxe. Not as powerful, not as agile, not such a good interior, not the same towing capacity. We now await a new engine which Ford have sanctioned. But no additional warranty on the new engine, so I shall be parting with this vehicle before the warranty expires. Just 3 years and 60,000 miles. Isuzu offer 5 years and 125,00 miles.

My Mini will be toasty warm in under five minutes, but the Ranger can take more than 30. It's something I need to talk to my dealer about as it doesn't seem right. The 3.2-litre is certainly thirsty around town (I average around 18mpg) but on the motorways it's actually OK and I tend to average around 35mpg. Still, if you want more, go for the smaller engine, or consider the L200 (and variants). Make sure you go for the Euro 6 version too. Also, if Apple Play and Google are your thing, then you'll need the Sync 3 system which is also more responsive. Sync 2 is still excellent but I wish I'd held out a few more months and waited for the upgrade. Overall, I can easily recommend the Ranger and would be happy to buy again. First as a long range sales rep in the UK and Europe driving the ubiquitous and much loved and lamented Sierra, then out here in Africa in the courier industry driving Ford Courier pickups before going into management driving luxury front wheel drive saloons. I've probably driven on every type of surface known to man and in every known condition, from frozen lakes in Sweden to wet clay here in Africa. For my mid-life crisis, I had my heart set on a Focus ST, but my wife and grown up kids rebelled and begged me to make a more sensible choice. And I am so glad I did. My 2.2 litre turbo diesel Supercab Ranger is quite simply the most incredible vehicle I've ever owned, and that includes high end Mercedes and Volvos. It just does everything perfectly, reliably, and with no fuss at all. The 6 speed automatic box is a dream, and the air conditioning is more than a match for the harshest of African heatwaves. I've seen very many posts here complaining of unreliability, but the feeling I get is that most people only post when they have a problem. You will always get lemons, no matter what the make. I now have everything I ever wanted in one package.

Rear wheel drive, diesel, automatic, great performance and fuel economy, commanding road presence, go anywhere, tow anything. What more could one ask for. Reliability: 5 5 No problems to date, serviced regularly. Performance: 5 5 It's no sports car, but makes no pretensions of being one. What it does does is give one a wonderful feeling of being unstoppable. On the open road, lightly or heavily laden, it sits comfortably at 75 mph. It will however chirp its wheels in a fast pull off, do 120 mph if needed, and do absolutely superb rear end drifting on dirt roads. Running costs: 5 5 For its size and weight, I cannot complain in the least. Fuel consumption incredible. I spent a good few minutes familiarising with the workings of the electronics and the Sync 3 Infotainment Centre. My mobiles paired well and it has fast voice activation for phones, heating, music, navigation etc, all worked well. The engine growls if accelerating a bit firmly at lights but once up to speed is extremely quiet especially at 70mph on motorways. On some occasions I found myself glancing at the right hand display looking for the little green arrow reminding me to change up. Acceleration from 0 keeps up with traffic and is reasonable to get to 60 and easily keeps up with traffic on A roads. This type of ride though is to be expected. Overall I think Ford have done well and is big improvement over my 2007 version (103k on the clock). Counting the miles and fuel I put in I am getting 38-40 mpg combined although the onboard computer tells me it is a bit less, 35mpg with steady legal driving. Scrolling through the right-hand menu I found one which surprised me namely about the oil and how many more miles I should do before it should be changed. Trailer sway assist is also useful too. Hopefully mpg should improve as bits bed in. This is the 4th one I've had over the last 10 years (2.5, 2.2, 3.2 old shape and this Wildtrak 3.2). I continue to buy them because they have all been totally reliable.

The Ford Ranger is a great truck to drive. Very powerful and sure-footed. I regularly tow at 3.5t and the Ranger has taken it all in its stride. As for another, I'm not sure. Let's get this one back on the road and see how things work out. But Ford dealerships. This time I went for the full off road package and the auto box. This version is a serious bit of kit, great off road, also brilliant on the motorway. It's super quiet at 70-80mph. At 70mph the engine is idling almost only 1800rpm. The build quality is excellent and if you look underneath the frame and the axles they have used are more land cruiser like than hilux. Last one covered 160K for work and private mileage never had a single problem. Hard not to see why this is now the most popular ute, bakkie and pickup in the UK, Australia and South Africa. I will buy another one for sure. The 3.2 is the best engine. If you tow you know. Reliability: 5 5 Faultless Performance: 5 5 Once it gets past 30mph is gives big BMWs a.run for their money. Any sales dude in a euro box doesn't stand a chance. None of the doors shut properly, sometimes they close in one go, sometimes you have to slam and slam them 4 or 5 times, it's very frustrating. The engine clatters like an old tractor until it's been running for at least 5 minutes, we have had tyre pressure sensors failing - twice - even though it's less than 5 months old. Even the bluetooth connectivity is intermittent, it's like a Lada in terms of build quality and I will never consider a new or used Ford ever again. Reliability: 2 2 Poor, as is the build quality. Performance: 2 2 Slow, considering the amount of fuel it gets through. Running costs: 2 2 Only 25 mpg, time wasted going to dealer for stupid niggly faults costs me money, I wasted 3 hours this week alone for a fault that came back within 15 miles. I have three little bugs with the car that are quite annoying.

The ignition barrel isn't lit up, neither are the electric mirror switches that are hidden out of view behind the steering wheel. There are also no front parking sensors. However, the biggest bug is the AdBlue system. I have used around 60 litres of it already. The warning system for top-up comes on with 1,700 mile range left, which is around three tanks of fuel. I have topped it up and each time it has taken three days to correct itself. As a result, every time the ignition is turned on, it bongs at you and orange light on dash also stays illuminated. The pickup could also do with a fully adjustable steering wheel and a better heater (although the heated seats are a godsend). UK-spec Continental tyres might as well be made of Marmite so I swapped out for Geolanders. I will keep you posted if any other issues occur. Reliability: Just AdBlue issues. My main use for it is trailer towing, pulling heavy loads and this was why I opted for a 3.2 manual. The fuel consumption is one mpg less than the Defender achieved, but travel is more comfortable and it's probably slightly quicker. It does feel quite safe when towing, there's no trailer sway and plenty of braking power. Its off road capabilities are quite good in 4 high but low box is a pig to engage or disengage.Don't buy one for motorway work and then moan about fuel consumption or ride quality. The only real problem I've had so far is that the battery doesn't seem big enough to cope with all the electrics and having then to start the 3.2-litre engine from cold. Nothing but problems from the start. Both vehicles pulled to the side. After several attempt by Ford at correcting the tracking we are still wearing out front tyres after around 8k miles. Faulty fuel sender had to be replaced due to incorrect readings and causing us to run out of fuel. Turbo on one went which then required an engine replacement (under warranty) it took the main dealer over three weeks to repair it. No offer of a courtesy vehicle, no feedback.

Cost us nearly ?1,000 in replacement vehicle hire. Recently the turbo inter cooler failed on the other. Ford not interested as it was 2k over the warranty mileage. Same vehicle, a brake pipe failed causing the calliper to seize. New calliper, discs and pads!! Also required a new battery after 2 years. Total non caring attitude from the main dealer. Totally would not recommend. Reliability: 3 3 Really not that reliable with all the faults. Performance: 2 2 Running costs: 1 1 Far to heavy on fuel. Can't get anywhere near Ford's mileage claims. Problems Brakes Electrics Engine Other brian davies from Oswestry 4 4 I would recommend this car to a friend Version Limited 2 3.2 Year of registration 2016 Average annual mileage More than 20,000 Typical MPG 28.00 Owned for Less than a year Bought car New Review Through work I get to use all the models of pick up but do find the Ranger the better to drive, the last pickup I had was a Navara and in honesty I would have happily replaced it with another but for the fact the dealer in our town closed which would mean servicing would become a 40 mile each way hassle, mine is the 3.2 and according to the computer it is doing 29.8 mpg which I am happy with as I do not treat it with kid gloves. Not as good a 4x4 in comparison with other pick ups. It's also one of the longest pick ups currently so can be awkward to park and manoeuvre. It spends more time in the garage than on the road and it's only 1,5 years old! I experienced a number of minor faults from faulty wheels, electronics to gear box malfunction. The frustrating thing is that Ford care services could not care less. For example to fix a dash board light malfunction it took them 20 days. On one occasion it was a faulty fuse and they did not even check the circuit. It simply sat there for 3 days returning back to me faulty. I had to find the fault myself and replace the fuse. Our leasing company also don't want to know or help despite their contractual obligation.

From my experience you'd be better using Hilux (also Toyota are much better at customer services by far) or Amarok at least VW own up to their mistakes. Very comfortable on journeys, it averages 36 mpg with the towing rear axle (the reduced tow capacity rear axle would give better fuel economy). The intercooler failed at 70,000 miles, but it's still drivable. After waiting six weeks for replacement part from main Ford dealer, ordered non generic but identical part from independent and fixed within 24 hours. The Bluetooth phone connection is intermittent. It's good looking apart from naff 4x4 stickers, which were removed during my first 24 hours of ownership. 100,000 miles is coming up and I'll certainly consider another, but competitors offer better warranties so may move elsewhere, as main Ford dealer service was very poor. Reliability: 4 4 Generally reliable, did have a rear leaf spring break, but it is frequently off road. At 75,000km I mentioned I had the EGR changed but the car was still not working properly. After several visits to several Ford dealers, I finally got the problem resolved. It was the torque converter was the cause of the problem. I learned it's a very expensive part and to change it they needed to take out the gearbox. Fortunately the car is still under the warranty period but I am worried for the consequences. Due to the inability of the Ford service people to find the problem I was forced to drive the car with this problem and apparently the transmission was affected as torque converter manages the fluids in the gearbox. So I intend to sell the car fast and to go for a Toyota Landcruiser. I had a test drive yesterday. My Ford is much better in many aspects when its working but I need a reliable car. Both car and Ford brand disappointed me big time. It comes from the factory with the wheels misaligned, therefore it destroys tyres if you do not check your wheel alignment right after purchase. Number 2, it does not brake properly.

We have the tech inspection to do each year, last time, with new disks - it failed to pass the test twice. Number 3, at 75000km my EGR stopped working, it has been replaced but the cars does not work properly. The people in Ford tell me the car is good because the computer does not show any problem but the car is not working properly, there are continuous interruptions coming either from the engine or from the gearbox, nobody could tell in two visits to the shop. I was very excited so far but now I need to search for alternatives, Ford Ranger is just an unreliable workhorse and the dealerships are worse. First of all, Ford is famous with its durable and massive trucks and I have to admit that I used it under very hard and rough conditions and I am very satisfied. The engine doesn't have any problems coping with the massive body. We towed nearly 4.2 tones with the Ranger and had no problem occurred. It is the cheapest yet most sophisticated car in its class. You should not expect comfort from it as we use it 18 hours in a day and the Ranger is not exhausted at all. Go for it. It’s the most durable and tough car you can ever find it. Don’t pay much attention what is been written before me. Because most of them don’t use this car really bad conditions like me. They don’t know much of its ability in construction and mining sites. The after care of Ford is the worst I have ever experienced period. I am paying for a vehicle that has done nothing but cost me money in lost business and finance payments. Reliability: 1 1 It's a joke. Performance: 1 1 The short journey from delivery point to dealer for repair was in limp mode so can't comment. Running costs: 1 1 Wouldn't know i've never had the chance to use any of the diesel i've put in it. Problems Engine Other Andy Hall from Durham 2 2 I wouldn't recommend this car to a friend Version 2.2 Auto Limited Year of registration 2012 Average annual mileage More than 20,000 Typical MPG 27.